-
 KDE-Apps.org Applications for the KDE-Desktop 
 GTK-Apps.org Applications using the GTK Toolkit 
 GnomeFiles.org Applications for GNOME 
 MeeGo-Central.org Applications for MeeGo 
 CLI-Apps.org Command Line Applications 
 Qt-Apps.org Free Qt Applications 
 Qt-Prop.org Proprietary Qt Applications 
 Maemo-Apps.org Applications for the Maemo Plattform 
 Java-Apps.org Free Java Applications 
 eyeOS-Apps.org Free eyeOS Applications 
 Wine-Apps.org Wine Applications 
 Server-Apps.org Server Applications 
 apps.ownCloud.com ownCloud Applications 
--
-
 KDE-Look.org Artwork for the KDE-Desktop 
 GNOME-Look.org Artwork for the GNOME-Desktop 
 Xfce-Look.org Artwork for the Xfce-Desktop 
 Box-Look.org Artwork for your Windowmanager 
 E17-Stuff.org Artwork for Enlightenment 
 Beryl-Themes.org Artwork for the Beryl Windowmanager 
 Compiz-Themes.org Artwork for the Compiz Windowmanager 
 EDE-Look.org Themes for your EDE Desktop 
--
-
 Debian-Art.org Stuff for Debian 
 Gentoo-Art.org Artwork for Gentoo Linux 
 SUSE-Art.org Artwork for openSUSE 
 Ubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Ubuntu 
 Kubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Kubuntu 
 LinuxMint-Art.org Artwork for Linux Mint 
 Arch-Stuff.org Art And Stuff for Arch Linux 
 Frugalware-Art.org Themes for Frugalware 
 Fedora-Art.org Artwork for Fedora Linux 
 Mandriva-Art.org Artwork for Mandriva Linux 
--
-
 KDE-Files.org Files for KDE Applications 
 OpenTemplate.org Documents for OpenOffice.org
 GIMPStuff.org Files for GIMP
 InkscapeStuff.org Files for Inkscape
 ScribusStuff.org Files for Scribus
 BlenderStuff.org Textures and Objects for Blender
 VLC-Addons.org Themes and Extensions for VLC
--
-
 KDE-Help.org Support for your KDE Desktop 
 GNOME-Help.org Support for your GNOME Desktop 
 Xfce-Help.org Support for your Xfce Desktop 
--
openDesktop.orgopenDesktop.org:   Applications   Artwork   Linux Distributions   Documents    LinuxDaily.com    Linux42.org    OpenSkillz.com   
 
Apps
News
Groups
Knowledge
Events
Forum
People
Jobs
Register
Login
APPS
-


Sponsoring


-
- Content .- Fans (1) .- Knowledge Base  . 

Pixel Image Editor

   1.0 Beta 7 build 699  

KDE Graphic Editor

Score 42%
kanzelskanzels
Home
Pixel Image Editor
zoom

Link:  Link
Downloads:  4344
Submitted:  Apr 11 2007
Updated:  Aug 29 2007

Description:

Pixel is a RGB, CMYK and HDR image editing, photo retouching, graphics manipulating and animation program available for many operating systems formerly known as Pixel32. It is available for Windows, Linux, Linspire, MacOSX, BeOS, Zeta, QNX, MorphOS, FreeBSD, eComStation, OS/2, SkyOS and even old plain DOS, for both x86 and PowerPC architectures.




Changelog:

Many stability issues resolved.




License: Proprietary License
Send to a friend
Subscribe
Other  Apps  from kanzels
Report inappropriate content



goto page: prev   1  2  3 

-
.

 Waiting for Licens

 
 by blumi40 on: Apr 17 2007  
Score 50%
blumi40blumi40

...that pissed me realy

I was purchased on the 10th of april over PayPal a Copy.

After X Mails and Contactdry my last drying is here.

PLS send me my purchased lizense !!


Reply to this

-

 I would like to buy

 
 by dedmopozzz on: Apr 25 2007  
Score 50%
dedmopozzzdedmopozzz
Home

I would like to buy you this program.
How can we do this?


Reply to this

-
.

 Another vaporware !

 
 by mahouny on: May 23 2007  
Score 50%
mahounymahouny

This program has a great potential, unfortunately it's turn to a vaporware like "Duke Nukem Forever"

(search google for term : vaporware )

You can buy the full version but it's completely ... unstable you simply can't work with it.

The stable version beta version 7 was promised since 2005 year, and every time there is only the promises " tomorrow it will be released !", "on the next week...", "it's almost finished...", "I'm packing the program, and will release it two days.."

BUT... 2 years passed and nothing was done...

People who came to developer's site doesn't know that because they can't read, the posts of unhappy customers, because this kind of post are deleted.
And there was a LOT of unhappy customers.

Absolutely no information for customers about the development status, simply NOTHING !!!

That's really S.U.C.K.S.

So guys, stay away of this.
Don't lose your time on this vaporware.

Better take your time and learn to use GIMP...
I know that the user interface is ugly, but at least it's FREE and powerful.

Best regards.


Reply to this

-
.

 Another vaporware !

 
 by mahouny on: May 23 2007  
Score 50%
mahounymahouny

This program has a great potential, unfortunately it's turn to a vaporware like "Duke Nukem Forever"

(search google for term : vaporware )

You can buy the full version but it's completely ... unstable you simply can't work with it.

The stable version beta version 7 was promised since 2005 year, and every time there is only the promises " tomorrow it will be released !", "on the next week...", "it's almost finished...", "I'm packing the program, and will release it two days.."

BUT... 2 years passed and nothing was done...

People who came to developer's site doesn't know that because they can't read, the posts of unhappy customers, because this kind of post are deleted.
And there was a LOT of unhappy customers.

Absolutely no information for customers about the development status, simply NOTHING !!!

That's really S.U.C.K.S.

So guys, stay away of this.
Don't lose your time on this vaporware.

Better take your time and learn to use GIMP...
I know that the user interface is ugly, but at least it's FREE and powerful.

Best regards.


Reply to this

-
.

 i agree

 
 by blurymind on: Aug 29 2007  
Score 50%
blurymindblurymind
student
Home

main reason for such slow and bad development is that the author wont release the source code...ever. Which is a contradiction,because he thinks he wont ever earn anything of this if he releases it...so it will earn bad reputation by the time a gimp version with better interface comes out and beats it to a pulp on the open source scene.

to author

My best advice is, if you want this to ever get to a working ACTIVE state and become popular (not only on the linux scene,since its the closest pshop clone) is GPL it or find another license which lets others help you and work on it (without paying them,they will do it for free). One man projects always fail. You will earn money from it then too. Believe me,you will. Think about. Why not sell Cds of its special version with a good collection of brushes,screentones,fonts,plugins...
Your marketing strategy is pretty weak and won't get you far.

...and May the source be with you.. @655
Reply to this

-

 Re: i agree

 
 by mdriftmeyer on: Aug 30 2007  
Score 50%
mdriftmeyermdriftmeyer

He should contact a Lawyer, incorporate correctly and create an NDA where he can coordinate with Developers to produce an end product.

Of course, he could target different platforms with varying levels of functionality to justify a fee.

Or better yet, since he's mainly using GNOME why not contact the GNOME Team and create a series of meetings to discuss his goals and concerns therein by get funding and support.

He could get some development help and have his tool actually help drive Linux into the mainstream of the average graphic artist by having this product on every copy of DELL systems running Linux, etc.

He could get easily be well funded and provide this product for free to Linux users.

DELL and other OEMs could use it to help sell their systems to graphics users.

Add the current RAW file support and what not and he could have a product competitive with Lightroom, Aperture, Photoshop, etc.


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: i agree

 
 by blurymind on: Aug 30 2007  
Score 50%
blurymindblurymind
student
Home

yes,he could, but he won't..

Gimp dev's are already thinking of group windows and inner tabs,and all the features he has over it wont help him get it far,since it lacks many basic features and its in a stall as it seems.
There are many things to gain from the open source world.GPL doesnt mean free, but there are some people that are too basic to understand it...There is money.Probably alot more than the marketing model he is trying to apply at the momment (add up slow development,buggy app,complains,delays,wrong deadlines,bad reputation...)

even not free,if it goes popular,everybody would be able to crack it or have a serial for it,and it will still be in the same tarpit it is now. (every register to use system has a way to be cracked,dont forget that).

Being open source wouldnt trash the work he has done on it.No, on the contrary,it IS now giving the fruits of it,by giving this opportunity to take a chance and see the gains of it.Being the only close alternative of photoshop's gui only linux (because there are on other systems)+ rapid development (probably get some gimp devs aboard)= world popularity+good product that will be updated and will evolve no mater what + lots of money (not only donations,but money from contracts he will be able to make with serious companies....

but as it seems to me,he wont ,ever and he will die developing it and maybe not get it pretty far. Maybe wait 10 more years to see something happen. Ofcoyurse,pretty soon we will have better alternatives on or plathform than buggy pixel and everybody will forget about it ever existed.

...and May the source be with you.. @655
Reply to this

-
.

 shame it is closed

 
 by madpuppy on: Aug 30 2007  
Score 50%
madpuppymadpuppy

The comments here are correct, I think that the author should dual license Pixel, GPL the linux version and keep the
Apple and Windows versions closed, that way the author could benefit from the help of the community and can still make money from the closed source OS users. also, like previous users stated, you can release a "special" *nix version with added features like brushes and filter packs.

there is logic in this method, I think that the author fears losing something if he gpl's pixel.

P.S.
I was going to purchase this program until I found out it was closed and in beta forever. so there is loss for the author by following this path. trying to beat Adobe at their own game is very hard, let the throngs of OSS devs give you a hand making this program great.


Reply to this

-

 Re: shame it is clos

 
 by andrewcruickshank on: Sep 3 2007  
Score 50%
andrewcruickshankandrewcruick shank
Andrew Cruickshank
Home

I agree with this, but he should probably use GTK instead of QT


Reply to this

goto page: prev   1  2  3 

Add commentBack




-
Linux42.org
-
NEWS
-
Popular Groups
-
Newest Groups
-
FORUM
-
POLL
-
Do you like or dislike Ubuntu Unity?
 Yes, unity is alien technology!
 It is less confusing than Gnome 3 default, shell.
 Granny thinks it is much more usable than Gnome 2
 Canonical is embarrasing itself with this split project
 Gnome 3 default shell is much better
 I dislike Unity, Gnome 3 default shell is alien technology!
 None of the above, I like the 2Gb for free and Apple alike behavior. Will post a comment instead

resultmore
KDE-LOOK.ORG
-
 
 
 Who we are
Contact
More about us
Frequently Asked Questions
Register
Twitter
Blog
Explore
Apps
Jobs
Knowledge
Events
People
Updates on identi.ca
Updates on Twitter
Facebook App
Content RSS   
Events RSS   

Participate
Groups
Forum
Add App
Public API
About KDE-Apps.org
Legal Notice
Spreadshirt Shop
CafePress Shop
Advertising
Sponsor us
Report Abuse
 

Copyright 2003-2013 KDE-Apps.org Team  
All rights reserved. KDE-Apps.org is not liable for any content or goods on this site.
All contributors are responsible for the lawfulness of their uploads.
KDE and K Desktop Environment are trademarks of KDE e.V.